Take the time to do it right

This week we were able to make a few corrections to the EAD for the Suzuki collection and enter the collection level data for the Baptist Convention. The supervisor will look over the Baptist EAD and then we will be able to add in the container list to the record. I am anxious to get it posted on OAC but it will be worth the time to get it right.

I completed re-foldering the Nuclear Disarmament collection. The collection was organized by function: Activities, References (letters), and Peace Pastoral (a letter from the Council of Bishops calling for peace). I opted to retain the original order. On my next work day I will begin on the in-house finding aid for that collection.

Donor Relations

This week’s EAD progress was hampered by not having the current version of the software on the computer I was working on. The supervisor should have the right version installed by my next working day.

I began processing a new collection in the interim. It is a collection of mostly educational materials which the church used to teach about nuclear disarmament. It is pretty well organized I believe original order will be best in this case. I am mostly re-foldering and removing rusty clips and such.

On a different subject, I was able to spend some time talking with the Asst. Archivist about creating relationships with donors. We talked about how it often takes years to move from first contact to finally taking possession of records. It is not only convincing the donors of the institutions ability to care for the records, it is about the donor giving up their own responsibility for the records. They may have had possession of their records for 25 or 50 years. At that point the donor may be facing their own issues of mortality and immortality. Do they even want their records available after they are gone? 

First EAD

This was a good week. I finished the container lists for the Baptist Convention and was able to enter the Suzuki collection into the OAC. Well at least I began I finished entering the metadata. And I saw the EAD. I believe there is a proofreading step before it is officially posted. I love being able to do this. I have made more use of the LOC title and subject headings than I thought I would. Here is just the first part of the EAD.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

  <!DOCTYPE ead (View Source for full doctype...)>

- <ead>

- <eadheader langencoding="iso639-2b" scriptencoding="iso15924" repositoryencoding="iso15511" countryencoding="iso3166-1" dateencoding="iso8601">

  <eadid countrycode="us" mainagencycode="CBGTU">suzuki.xml</eadid>

- <filedesc>

- <titlestmt>

  <titleproper>Inventory of the Suzuki, Lester Eisaburo Collection</titleproper>

  <titleproper type="filing">Suzuki (Lester Eisaburo) Collection</titleproper>

  <author>Angela Noble</author>

  </titlestmt>

- <publicationstmt>

  <publisher>Graduate Theological Union Archives</publisher>

- <address>

  <addressline>Graduate Theological Union</addressline>

  <addressline>2400 Ridge Road</addressline>

  <addressline>Berkeley, California, 94709</addressline>

  <addressline>Phone: (510) 649-2507</addressline>

  <addressline>Fax: (510) 649-2508</addressline>

  <addressline>Email: lglenn@gtu.edu</addressline>

  <addressline>URL: http://library.gtu.edu/archives/</addressline>

  </address>

  <date>© 2011</date>

  <p>Graduate Theological Union. All rights reserved.</p>

Today I finished the container list for the Northern Conference and started on the Southern Conference. I also did some research for the history. The Northern is so much more regimented or perhaps we just received a better submission from them. They had a report for each year and each association had a minutes report for each year. The Southern Conference is much more sporadic. A few of the associations submitted regular reports but mostly it is a random assemblage of letters, programs, and information on projects that were started and not followed through on.

I also found out that the GTU does not use Archivist’s Toolkit for their EAD. David (the asst. archivist) said they found it more trouble than it was worth. I also found that the latest report on Cinda the head archivist is that she will probably be out until some time in April. I guess that she will be there in time  to say goodbye.

Working on precision

The asst. archivist told me that the date ranges I was using would not translate well into EAD. So today I subdivided some of the files to make them more precise. It slowed down my momentum a bit but I want to learn to do it the most efficient way, which is to say “get it right the first time.” I was able to begin on the container list, and made a few notes on the history of the organization.

I believe I have figured out the hierarchy. The division between the Northern and Southern Baptist Conferences is more pronounced than it seemed from my first go through of the records. It might be better to think of them as completely different series, but there are a few outlier documents that are from a different part of the country.

Baptist Collection

I had a productive day at the GTU this week. I finished up the Suzuki box and began on a larger collection. This one is six boxes of records from the Baptist Conference. It is awesome being able to work with records this old, some go back to the 1850’s. I have never worked with records so old. The bound books of minutes in the secretary’s neat handwriting are great.

I am trying to work out the organizational structure of the organization. I am not a Baptist, so this is new to me. It looks like churches belong to associations and associations belong to conferences. Then there are committees for particular issues that may cross over conferences. I have begun putting subject headings on the files, and once I am more confident in the hierarchy I can begin arranging the files.

First day

This week I spent my internship day reading the policy manual and then processed a small collection, the Suzuki collection. I cleared away the rusting clips, moved everything into folders and arranged it. The GTU uses MARC standard which I have read about but not used. It is not so different from Dublin core except when it comes to the subject field. I had to skip over that as it seemed to need more familiarity with the classifications than I have.

I can see how this will meet competencies d and e but it remains to be seen how we will meet f. I really wish the head archivist was back, but she is not expected to return for another month. She continues to be out on disability leave. She is consulting with the asst. archivist by phone. I am sure this will work out, but can’t help but feel that something is missing.